April 22nd, 2013 DePuy Hip Implant Failures Continue – First Jury Verdict

When someone goes in for a serious surgical procedure, like a hip replacement, they have several reasonable expectations:

  • The medical operation is necessary
  • Their doctor is properly trained and capable of performing the procedure
  • The tools and medical devices used in the surgery are safe and secure

Sadly, those very simple and fair expectations are frequently not met, resulting in serious injury (and even death) for many unsuspecting patients. In fact, when medical devices involved in the procedure are unsafe, it is not uncommon for hundreds or even thousands of patients to suffer serious harm. To illustrate the point one need look no further than the high-profile example of defective metal-on-metal hip implant devices manufactured by a company called DePuy.

Depuy Hip Recall

In August of 2010 a division of Johnson & Johnson known as DePuy Orthopaedics issued a recall on two hip replacement systems: the ASR™ XL Acetabular System and DePuy ASR Hip Resurfacing System. These were metal “joint and socket” devices that were implanted into patients during hip replacement surgeries. The Hip Resurfacing System was actually not approved in the United States, but the ASR™ XL Acetabular System was available everywhere.

The recall was issued after vociferous calls from advocates following studies which suggested the products failed at far higher rates than acceptable. As many as two to three patients out of every ten who received the product may ultimately suffer harm. Patients who have the defective hips experience pain, discomfort, swelling, and many ultimately have trouble walking. For some a risky (and costly) hip repair surgery is necessary.

Design flaws seem to be at the heart of the problem. In some cases the implant is dislodged from the bone around the hip. This causes severe pain and may cause bone fractures. Additionally, both the “ball” and “socket” portions of the device are made of metal. At times, the rubbing of these two metallic pieces can cause damage, releasing small particles into the bloodstream. Adverse reactions and fluid build up can be spurred by those particles, resulting in swelling, muscle loss, bone damage, and more.

The bottom line: Patients may experience a myriad of very serious problems as a result of defects with these DePuy hip implants.

Florida DePuy Hip Cases

Sadly, many Floridians are still feeling the effects of this defective product. The devices were used as recently as two and a half years ago, meaning that some local residents who received the implant may not yet be showing signs of problems. But the device could fail in the next few years.

South Florida residents should be aware that product liability laws and basic negligence principles may provide them avenues to recover for their medical expenses, pain and suffering, and more as a result of receiving this defective medical device. Thousands of Depuy implant lawsuits have already been filed, and many more are expected. These suits usually alleged negligence on the part of the company for failing to keep patients safe and allowing the poorly designed product to be used on thousands.

In fact, the first of these cases recently went to trial. After hearing the evidence about the injuries suffered by the plaintiff in that case and the actions of the company, the jury returned a verdict in the amount of $8.3 million for the injured patient. That amount was only for compensatory damages. Many suspect that future verdicts may result in juries also awarding punitive damages for the company’s conduct.

If you or someone you know may have been harmed in this way, act quickly to protect your
rights. Contact Baker, Zimmerman, and Perez using our form below, or call us at 954-509-1900.

April 15th, 2013 Remember Pool Safety Precautions This Summer

Remember Pool Safety Precautions This Summer

One of the best parts about living in South Florida is the (nearly) year round access to your pool. As we move through the heart of spring and into the summer, the pool becomes more and more attractive as a nice escape from the summer sun. And while your pool or spa is generally a nice place for the family to play, every year, hundreds of children under the age of 15 suffer drowning and non-fatal submersion injuries.

According to Pool and Spa Submersion: Estimated Injuries and Reported Fatalities Report from the CPSC, drowning deaths for children under the age of 15 averaged 385 annually between 2005 and 2007. 75% of those deaths involved children under 5, and 67% of those drownings involved children between 1 and 3 years old. In addition, there was an average of 4,200 pool or spa-related, emergency submersion injuries for children younger than 15 years of age between 2007 and 2009. Florida leads the country in childhood drownings, with the majority of these accidents occurring between May and August.

Most, if not all, of these tragedies could have been prevented with pool safety precautions and general safeguarding of the swimming area. Not surprisingly, 44% of drownings occur at home, while 23% occur at a family or friends home. The most important safety measure is to make sure your children are always within arms’ reach when around a swimming area. As a parent of a young child, I am all too familiar with how quickly arm’s reach turns into a chase. That is why it is essential to install a pool fence, provide your children with swim lessons and to learn CPR.

Unfortunately, supervision, gates and lessons are not always enough. The Virginia Graeme Baker Pool & Spa Safety Act is named after, a 7-year old girl who drowned after she was trapped under water by the suction from a hot tub drain. Graeme, as she was called, was a member of her community swim and diving team, and was able to swim without assistance since she was 3 years old. In June 2002, Graeme was caught in a hot tub drain, whose suction was so strong even her mother and two men could not pull her out. Finally, the drain cover broke, but Graeme had already drowned. After her tragic death, her mother lobbied Congress to enact a law to require anti-entrapment drain covers and other safety devices. The statute was sponsored by U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida, and was signed into law in December 2007.

The point of this article is not to ruin your summer fun, but to remind you of the inherent danger living in your backyard.  By safeguarding your pool with the proper anti-entrapment drain covers and other preventative devices, you can greatly decrease the chance of a submersion related accident in your backyard. Many pool fences can be fitted with an alarm in case your children or their friends find their way into the pool. Most importantly, supervision is the best safety measure.

April 9th, 2013 UM Insurance – It’s Not You I’m Worried About, It’s The Other Drivers

It’s Not You I’m Worried About, It’s The Other Drivers

WHAM! You just got rear-ended in a car accident. Your head is spinning, your heart is racing and your
adrenaline is pumping. The last thing on your mind is whether the person who hit you has insurance,
as you are thankful to be walking out of the crash alive. The police officer hands you the “Exchange of
Information” sheet, which says that the other driver has a well-known insurance company. On the way
to the hospital you remember that your agent told you that you have “Full Coverage.”

What does full coverage even mean? In the State of Florida, the minimum insurance limit that a driver
must carry in order to purchase a tag is $10,000.00 in Personal Injury Protection (PIP) and $10,000.00
in Property Damage Liability. PIP is no-fault insurance that provides the insured with up to $10,000.00
in medical benefits, regardless of whether they caused the accident. Property Damage Liability only
extends to the property itself. That’s right: there is no requirement in Florida that a driver carry Bodily
Injury Liability insurance in the event they injure the other driver.

For many of us, insurance policies read like a foreign language. Most insurance carriers will provide
Bodily Injury (BI) Liability insurance, which protects you in the event that you injure someone else
in an accident. Unfortunately in South Florida, that might not be enough. In October 2012, the Sun-
Sentinel reported that nearly 24 percent of all drivers in Florida don’t have any insurance, putting
Florida in the top five states with uninsured motorists. South Florida has a reputation for an even higher
concentration of uninsured motorists. These statistics do not take into account the number of drivers
who carry $10,000.00-$50,000.00 in BI coverage. If you are seriously injured in an accident, these
minimal policies may not be enough to even cover your medical bills.

UM Insurance

My mother always told me, “It’s not you I’m worried about, it’s the other drivers.” Fortunately, there is
a simple way to protect against those other drivers. Your insurance carrier must offer you Uninsured/
Underinsured Motorist Insurance (UM).

This variety of coverage takes the place of the other driver’s
absent insurance, or steps in right behind the other driver’s insufficient insurance. This insurance is so
important, that the insurance company must not only offer it to you, but you have to go out of your
way to reject the coverage. If you fail to reject UM insurance, by law, the insurance company must
automatically provide you with coverage equal to your BI limits. This underlines how essential it is to
carry UM insurance.

Don’t stop there. Ask your insurance company about “stacking” your UM coverage,
which multiplies the policy limits by the amount of cars insured under your policy. For example, if you
have $50,000.00 in UM coverage and three vehicles on your policy, then each driver insured under the
policy will have UM limits of $150,000.00.

There are other types of coverage that exist, but by carrying UM insurance, you are greatly increasing
the odds of protecting yourself. As always, we hope that you never need to make an insurance claim
or need a personal injury lawyer, but if you do make sure that you are really “fully” covered. For more
information, please visit our personal injury page.

February 1st, 2013 Baker, Zimmerman & Perez Asked to Appear At Texting and Driving Press Conference

On January 30th, State Senator Maria Sachs held a press conference at Broward College to announce her initiative to pass a new bill in Florida making it illegal to text and drive. Senator Sachs’ office contacted Baker Zimmerman and Perez after seeing the recent article regarding the dangers of texting and driving, which has appeared in several magazines throughout South Florida. Joshua Frachtman and Rusty Perez showed their support for the Senator’s bill and had the opportunity to speak with Senator Sachs about ways to become more involved in the process.
Following the press conference, Broward Sheriff Officers conducted simulations demonstrating the difference in reaction time when a driver was forced to make a quick decision when receiving a text. We also had the opportunity to participate in the simulation. WSVN 7 accompanied Rusty Perez during his test drive, which can be seen in the video behind the link. Making the roadways safer for all drivers is at the heart of the Senator’s bill, and we are thrilled to have been a part of this important announcement.
http://bakerzimmerman.com/Blog/2013-01-30/27/The_Dangers_of_Driving_While_Intexticated

http://www.wsvn.com/news/articles/local/21009728396276/senator-and-officers-push-texting-and-driving-bill/

January 28th, 2013 The Dangers of Driving While “Intexticated”

In today’s world everyone watches the road carefully while driving.   Certainly, no one is distracted by telephone calls, Facebook postings or Instagram.  If this were only true.  The truth is that the manner in which we use technology has made already dangerous activities, such as driving, even more dangerous.  Our quest to stay “connected” may ultimately lead to the ultimate disconnection ?” loss of life.  Consider the following statistics.

In 2011, approximately 23% of automobile collisions involved the use of a cell phone.  In real numbers this equals approximately 1.3 million automobile accidents that could have been avoided.  It translates into 1.3 million families being affected in one form or another due to the loss or injury of a loved one.   Unfortunately, drivers do not appreciate the distraction caused by cell phone use.

If I were to ask the reader to put on a blindfold and drive in traffic the length of a football field at 55 MPH, the reader would tell this author he is insane.  Well, this scenario is very similar to what is happening while someone is texting and driving.  The minimal amount of time the driver’s attention is taken away from the road and traffic conditions is 5 seconds while texting.  An automobile driving at the speed of 55MPH travels the length of a football field in 5 seconds.

Texting while driving increases the likelihood of a crash by 23 times.  However, the use of the cell phone itself even while not texting can be dangerous as well.  For example, dialing while driving makes the likelihood of an accident 2.8 times greater.  Just talking on the cell phone increases your chances of an accident by 1.3 times more.  Finally, the mere reaching for the cell phone increases the likelihood of an accident by 1.4 times.

The statistical data is staggering when you consider the number of accidents that could be avoided by simply putting the cell phone away while driving.  Consider that 13% of drivers between the ages of 18-20 involved in an automobile accident admitted to texting or talking on their mobile devices at the time of the accident.  Arguably, the number is greater because this statistic only represents those drivers who actually admitted to the use of the mobile phone while driving.  Significantly, 52% of drivers that own cell phones have admitted to talking on the cell phone while driving and 34% say they have texted while driving.  Again, this only represents the percentage of drivers that were honest about cell phone usage while driving.

“SURE I DO IT, BUT I’M VERY CAREFUL” OR  “I HAVE BEEN DOING THIS FOR AS LONG AS I CAN REMEMBER AND NOTHING HAS EVER HAPPENED.”  Please, do not be this person.  Think about the number of lives you will affect if you cause an accident because you were using your cell phone.  Nothing is more important than your life and safety, and the life and safety of those around you.  YOU CAN ALWAYS RETURN A CALL OR A TEXT, BUT YOU CAN NEVER RETURN A LIFE!

As always, if you are involved in an accident contact a qualified attorney immediately.  A competent attorney specializing in auto accidents will always investigate cell phone usage in evaluating your case.  REMEMBER DON’T TEXT AND DRIVE.  If it is so important that you must send that text — PULL OVER to a safe place before you endanger yourself and others.  Drive safely and keep your eyes on the road!

September 7th, 2012 Recall Update: Child Safety Alert

Manufactures are constantly working to make their products safer for use by the public. Generally, the cost associated with making a product less dangerous is nominal compared to the danger certain products can present. Unfortunately, not all defects are identified and remedied in time. As a parent, I find it imperative to be proactive about recalls, especially when the safety of my child is at risk. Here is a list of recent recalls of children’s products that I have come across.
Baby Seats Recalled for Repair by Bumbo International Due to Fall Hazard Consumers should order free repair kit.
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced on August 15, 2012 a voluntary recall of the Bumbo Baby Seat. Consumers should stop using recalled products immediately unless otherwise instructed. According to the report, babies can maneuver out of or fall from the Bumbo seat, posing a risk of serious injuries.
CPSC and Bumbo International know of at least 50 incidents after the October 2007 voluntary recall in which babies fell from a Bumbo seat while it was being used on a raised surface. Nineteen of those incidents included reports of skull fractures. CPSC and Bumbo International are aware of an additional 34 post-recall reports of infants who fell out or maneuvered out of a Bumbo seat used on the floor or at an unknown elevation, resulting in injury. Two of these incidents involved reports of skull fractures, while others reported bumps, bruises and other minor injuries.
Consumers should immediately stop using the product until they order and install a free repair kit, which includes: a restraint belt with a warning label, installation instructions, safe use instructions and a new warning sticker. The belt should always be used when a child is placed in the seat. Even with the belt, the seat should never be used on any raised surface. Consumers should also immediately stop using Bumbo seat covers that interfere with the installation and use of the belt. A video demonstrating proper installation of the restraint belt and proper use of the Bumbo seat are available at www.BumboUSA.com
Trampolines Recalled by Panline USA Due to Fall Hazard
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission announced on July 18, 2012 a voluntary recall of the Panline Tramoline. Consumers should stop using recalled products immediately unless otherwise instructed. The product is a small, toddler-sized trampoline with a yellow and blue colored handlebar over the top of the trampoline for toddlers to hold on to while jumping. According to the report, the handlebar can break, causing a fall hazard.
Innovage Recalls Discovery Kids Lamps Due to Fire and Burn Hazards
On July 3, 2012, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission announced a voluntary recall of the Discovery Kids?”? Animated Marine and Safari Lamps. Consumers should stop using recalled products immediately unless otherwise instructed. It is illegal to resell or attempt to resell a recalled consumer product.
This recall involves Discovery Kids Animated Marine and Safari Lamps that feature rotating films with marine or safari scenes. The placement of internal wires near the circuit board can cause electrical short-circuiting and sparking, posing a fire and a burn hazard to consumers, particularly young children. Consumers should immediately stop using the lamps and contact Innovage for instructions on how to obtain a full refund.
Peg Perego Recalls Strollers Due to Risk of Entrapment and Strangulation; One Child Death Reported
On July 24, 2012, the CPSC, in cooperation with Peg Perego USA Inc., announced a voluntary recall of about 223,000 strollers due to a risk of entrapment and strangulation.
A 6-month-old baby boy from Tarzana, Calif. died of strangulation after his head was trapped between the seat and the tray of his Peg Perego stroller in 2004. Another baby, a 7-month-old girl from New York, N.Y., nearly strangled when her head became trapped between the seat and the tray of her stroller in 2006.
Entrapment and strangulation can occur, especially to infants younger than 12 months of age, when a child is not harnessed. An infant can pass through the opening between the stroller tray and seat bottom, but his/her head and neck can become entrapped by the tray. Infants who become entrapped at the neck are at risk of strangulation.
The recall involves two different older versions of the Peg Perego strollers, Venezia and Pliko-P3, manufactured between January 2004 and September 2007, in a variety of colors. They were manufactured prior to the existence of the January 2008 voluntary industry standard which addresses the height of the opening between the stroller’s tray and the seat bottom. The voluntary standard requires larger stroller openings that prevent infant entrapment and strangulation hazards. Only strollers that have a child tray with one cup holder are part of this recall. Strollers with a bumper bar in front of the child or a tray with two cup holders are not included in this recall.
CPSC and Peg Perego warn consumers that these strollers may be available on the secondhand market, in thrift stores or at yard sales. Consumers should not buy or sell these recalled strollers until the repair kit is installed.
NOTE: When using a stroller, parents and caregivers are encouraged to always secure children by using the safety harness and never leave them unattended. To learn more about the importance of stroller safety, see CPSC’s safety alert: www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/pubs/5096.pdf
Chicco Polly High Chairs Recalled Due to Laceration Hazard
On July 12, 2012, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission and Health Canada, announced a voluntary recall of the Chicco Polly High Chair, because children can fall on or against the pegs on the rear legs of the high chair, resulting in a bruising or laceration injury. The report acknowledges 21 reports of incidents in which a child fell against the peg and received injuries, including four laceration injuries requiring medical closure (stitches, tape or glue) and one scratched cornea.
This recall involves a range of Chicco Polly high chairs with pegs on the back legs intended for tray storage. The high chairs have a folding metal frame for storage and a reclining seat. The recalled high chairs can be identified by the model number and date code printed on a label on the underside of the seat, close to the footrest. Consumers should contact Chicco for a free peg cover kit which will be mailed to them. To help prevent injuries before repair, consumers should store the tray on the pegs when the high chair is not in use.
Children’s Pajamas Recalled by Ishtex Textile Products Due to Violation of Federal Flammability Standard
On June 28, 2012, the CPSC announced a voluntary recall of the Gabiano Collection of Boys and Girls Pajamas, Sets and Gowns. The pajamas fail to meet the federal flammability standards for children’s sleepwear posing a risk of burn injury to children. The garments were advertised and sold as children’s sleepwear. Children should stop wearing the recalled sleepwear immediately, and consumers should return it for a refund, exchange or store credit.
For additional information regarding these recalls, as well as other recent recalls, please visit http://www.cpsc.gov. This list in no way is intended to represent a complete listing of recent recalls of children’s products. It is important to stay on top of recall alerts, which can be found at http://www.cpsc.gov.  If you or a loved one has been injured by one of these products, or another defective product, please contact the attorneys of Baker, Zimmerman & Perez today.
ARE YOU INJURED?
WE CAN HELP. FILL OUT OUR FORM FOR A FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION